Ryan Gosling in Gangster Squad Hollywood’s Premier Man-Boy Has a Dash of Cary Grant

Cary Grant might have disdained Ryan Gosling's grooming, but he'd surely appreciate the younger actor's easy way with insinuating banter.
There’s a great, emblematic exchange in the new movie Gangster Squad, one you’ve surely seen in the film’s TV ads, where Emma Stone, playing a 1940s moll in a crimson dress with a slit up to her hip socket, asks Ryan Gosling’s plainclothes L.A. cop what kinds of games he likes to play. “Post Office,” he replies nonchalantly. “That’s a kids’ game,” she says, dismissing him. “Not the way I play it,” he deadpans, earning an intrigued smile and a raised eyebrow.

Actually, those are pretty hokey lines, at least on paper. On-screen, however, Stone and Gosling hit whatever sweet spot the dialogue has—somewhere between conviction and camp—and the scene sings with smirky, sexy, meat-headed energy, as does most of the rest of the picture, which may be the silliest movie ever to be “inspired by a true story” and also to open with a thug being pulled apart by two cars. It’s the kind of movie that tricks you into thinking it’s better than it is—and it would be better still if the director, Ruben Fleischer (Zombieland and a bunch of stuff for Funny or Die), knew how to shoot and cut action scenes. Still, to my taste, Gangster Squad, which also stars James Brolin and Sean Penn, is among the better comic-book movies of recent years—one, because it maintains a sense of humor about itself, and two, because no one’s wearing tights.
The line about Post Office also underscores what I think distinguishes Gosling as a movie star, aside from his obvious talent. While male stars have been dining out on boyish sex appeal since at least Douglas Fairbanks, and bad boys are a dime a dozen in today’s Hollywood, few bridge quite as wide a gap between youthful eagerness and adult knowing as Gosling does. He’s like a louche puppy dog, the rare actor who has pinchable cheeks as well as cutting-edge cheekbones. No matter how skeevy or seductive, he always exudes a core innocence, which is what made him likable even as a puffed-up lady’s man striking sparks with Stone, again, in Crazy Stupid Love. (If this were the real 1940s, the pair would be sentenced to make a whole string of movies together and we’d all be better off for it. Also, it would be a really bad idea to remake Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, but if Scott Rudin or someone were forcing you to, you could do worse than cast Brolin and Gosling, who have their own fine chemistry.)

Part of Gosling’s seeming innocence is in the voice he affects. In interviews he’s said he patterned its nasal, even sniveling pitch after Marlon Brando’s tortured-man-child tones; a blind person listening to either might assume they look like 14-year-old Steve Buscemis. At this point, though, Brando’s become a boring yardstick for young actors. (Doesn’t anyone want to be “the new Kurt Russell”? Maybe Ryan Reynolds?) Gosling has at least one thing over his idol: he’s intentionally funny. I don’t want to go overboard with the dead-star comparisons, but Gosling approaches comedy with an ease that harbors at least a sprinkling of Cary Grant’s glen-plaid magic; Brando tended to approach comedy as if it were mud wrestling, as anyone who has seen The Missouri Breaks can tell you.